
Buying guide · August 21, 2026
How to choose an electric bike
The seven decisions that actually determine whether you will enjoy the bike, in the order worth making them.
Read moreCompare AMYET’s Most Popular E-Bikes
Buying guide
Wheel diameter changes acceleration, comfort, storage and how the bike feels at 25 MPH. It is a bigger decision than it looks.
Published August 21, 2026 · 10 min read

The short version
Wheel size is usually discussed as a matter of looks or of rider height. It is neither. It is geometry, and the geometry produces effects you feel on every ride.
When a wheel meets a pothole edge, a kerb lip or a tree root, the angle at which it strikes that obstacle is set by the ratio of the obstacle height to the wheel radius. A larger wheel meets the same obstacle at a shallower angle, so more of the impact pushes the wheel forward and less of it pushes the wheel upward and backward.
The practical result is that a 26-inch wheel rolls over a two-inch edge that a 20-inch wheel drops into and climbs out of. Neither stops the bike, but one costs you speed and comfort every time and the other does not.
Every one of those small impacts converts forward motion into vertical motion and heat. Over a mile of broken tarmac the larger wheel simply loses less of what you have put in, which is why a 26-inch bike feels like it wants to keep going and a 20-inch bike feels like it needs feeding.
A spinning wheel resists being tilted, and the resistance scales with both mass and radius. A larger wheel at the same road speed is turning more slowly but has more of its mass further from the axle, and the net effect on a bicycle is a bike that tracks straighter at speed and takes more input to steer. The 20-inch bike is quicker to change direction, which is an advantage in traffic and a liability at 28 MPH on a rough surface.
Note that the fat tire complicates all of this. A 4-inch casing already does much of the obstacle-swallowing that a bigger wheel does, so the gap between 20 and 26 inches on a fat bike is narrower than the same gap would be on two conventional bicycles. Our fat tire guide covers what the width itself contributes.
Everything above favours the larger wheel. These two do not.
A wheel has to be spun up as well as moved forward, and the effort required to spin it depends on how far its mass sits from the axle. A 20-inch wheel has less rotating inertia than a 26-inch wheel built from similar parts, so it comes up to speed more readily. On a bike that stops at every junction, that difference is felt dozens of times a ride.
The same applies in reverse under braking. Less rotating mass is less energy for the brakes to absorb, which on a heavy fat bike is a real advantage — particularly on the AMYET bikes that list mechanical rather than hydraulic discs.
For a given spoke count, gauge and rim material, a smaller wheel is stronger and stiffer. The spokes are shorter, so they flex less; the rim spans a smaller arc between supports, so it resists denting better; and the whole structure is less able to be pushed out of true by a kerb strike.
This matters more on e-bikes than on bicycles. These are heavy machines carrying heavy riders at motorised speeds, and a hub motor concentrates a large mass at the centre of the wheel while forcing an unusual spoke pattern around it. Both AMYET bikes list a 330 lb payload; the 20-inch wheel is the structurally easier way to reach that number. If you ride near the ceiling, our guide for heavier riders goes into how payload interacts with wheels and brakes.
This is the part that gets left out, and on a hub-motor e-bike it is central.
A hub motor spins at a certain rate for a given voltage and load. That rotational speed is converted into road speed by the circumference of the wheel it is built into. A 20-inch wheel covers less ground per revolution than a 26-inch one, so at identical motor RPM the smaller-wheeled bike is slower.
The other side of that trade is torque at the road. The wheel is a lever, and its radius is the lever arm. A shorter lever means the same motor torque produces more push at the contact patch. In effect, a small wheel is a lower gear permanently fitted to the bike: better from a standstill, better on a climb, and lower geared at the top end.
AMYET lists the same 1000W rated and 1500W peak figures for both the V9-G60 and the EB26, yet claims 32 MPH for the 20-inch G60 and 28 MPH for the 26-inch EB26. On the geometry alone you would expect the larger wheel to be the faster one, so the motors must be wound differently, or the controllers configured differently, or the figures derived under different conditions. AMYET does not publish motor winding, controller amperage or torque in newton-metres for either bike, so this is not something anyone can resolve from the specification sheets.
The legal consequence is worth noting. The EB26's 28 MPH sits exactly at the Class 3 ceiling in the US three-class framework used by most states. The G60's 32 MPH sits above every class, which in many jurisdictions means it is not legally an e-bike at its full speed. Most bikes in this category allow the limit to be set lower in the display, but that is a configuration you should confirm rather than assume. There is more on how power figures are quoted in our motor wattage guide.
The common advice is that short riders need small wheels and tall riders need large ones. It is roughly true and much less important than it sounds.
What actually determines fit is the frame: the standover height, the reach to the bars, and the range of seatpost adjustment. Wheel size influences standover, because a smaller wheel lets the designer put the top tube lower, but a well-designed 26-inch frame with a sloping or step-through top tube can have a lower standover than a badly designed 20-inch one.
AMYET does not publish recommended rider height ranges, frame reach or standover figures for any of the three bikes. If you sit at either extreme of the ranges above, that is a question worth putting to the seller before ordering rather than a thing to infer.
Six inches of wheel diameter becomes roughly a foot of extra bike length once the frame is built around it, plus the extra height. That is the difference between a bike that lives in a hallway and a bike that lives outside.
Concretely, the larger wheel makes each of these harder:
Neither bike is light. AMYET does not publish a bare weight for either the G60 or the EB26; the EB26 listing gives a 30 kg shipping weight, which includes packaging, and the EB26 also uses a high-carbon steel frame where steel is heavier than aluminium. The reasonable conclusion is that the 26-inch bike is the more awkward of the two to move by hand, but the precise figures are not available.
The two wheel sizes swap places as speed rises, and this is the clearest way to think about the choice.
The 20-inch bike is the better tool. It pulls away from lights harder, changes line more readily around a car door or a pedestrian, feels planted at walking pace, and stops in less distance because there is less rotating mass to shed. The busier ride over surface texture barely registers at this speed, especially through a 4-inch tire.
The positions reverse completely. At speed the small wheel feels busy: every ripple in the surface arrives as a distinct event, the bike needs more constant correction, and the shorter wheelbase gives less inherent directional stability. The 26-inch bike settles into a speed and holds it with much less input from the rider, which is less tiring over half an hour than it sounds.
This is a fatigue argument as much as a comfort one. A bike that needs continuous small corrections at speed is a bike you arrive tired from.
A 20-inch fat-tire e-bike with a hub motor, a wide saddle and a sizeable battery in the downtube does not read visually as a bicycle. It reads as a small motorcycle, and for some buyers that is the appeal and for others it is a problem.
It matters more than aesthetics alone, for three practical reasons.
The 26-inch fat bike sidesteps most of this. It reads as a mountain bike with thick tires, which is exactly what it is. If you ride mainly on shared paths or park at an institution with rules, that is a genuine, if unglamorous, argument for the larger wheel.
The G60 and the EB26 make an unusually clean comparison because so much is held constant. Both carry a 1000W rated hub motor with a 1500W peak claim, both run 4-inch tires, both use 7-speed drivetrains and mechanical-class disc brakes, both are rated to 330 lb, both are listed as UL 2849 by AMYET, and AMYET prices them $20 apart at $689 and $669.
But the wheel is not the only variable, and pretending otherwise would be dishonest. The G60 carries a 48V 20Ah pack, which is 960 watt-hours. The EB26 carries 48V 15Ah, which is 720. That is a third more stored energy on the smaller-wheeled bike, for twenty dollars more.
So the real decision is not simply 20 against 26. It is a smaller, quicker, stronger-wheeled bike with more range and a top speed above the legal classes, against a calmer, larger-wheeled bike with a lockable fork, a steel frame, a Class-3-compatible 28 MPH ceiling and a quarter less energy. Our G60 versus EB26 comparison takes that apart with the prices attached, and the battery and range guide explains why the watt-hour gap is the larger of the two differences.
The S8 is also on 20-inch wheels, which is a sensible pairing: on a dual-motor bike built for gradients and loose ground, the small wheel's torque multiplication and structural strength are exactly what you want.
Work through these in order. The first one that clearly applies to you should decide it.
Take the bike with the bigger battery. Wheel size changes how a ride feels; watt-hours change whether the ride happens. That is the reasoning behind where these bikes land on our best AMYET e-bikes page, and it is the same ordering our how to choose an electric bike framework applies more generally.
No, and in one respect they are stronger. For the same spoke count and rim material, a smaller wheel has shorter spokes and a tighter rim arc, which makes it stiffer and more resistant to being knocked out of true. What the smaller wheel gives up is stability at speed, because it drops into obstacles at a steeper angle and has less gyroscopic resistance to being deflected. On a heavy e-bike ridden mostly in town, the strength advantage is more relevant to daily life than the stability difference is.
On a hub-motor bike, a smaller wheel is effectively a lower gear. The motor turns at a similar rate but covers less ground per revolution, so top speed falls while push at the road rises. That means better acceleration and better climbing, and a lower ceiling. Manufacturer figures do not always follow this cleanly, because motor winding and controller settings differ between models. AMYET publishes 32 MPH for the 20-inch G60 and 28 MPH for the 26-inch EB26, which runs against the geometry and is not explained on their listings.
Yes, though it may not be comfortable over distance. Wheel size does not set fit on its own — frame reach, standover height and seatpost range do — but a 20-inch fat bike is usually built short, so a tall rider ends up with the bars close, the knees high and a riding position that feels cramped after half an hour. A 26-inch frame generally suits taller riders better. AMYET does not publish recommended rider heights or frame geometry for any of its bikes, so ask before ordering.
Wheel diameter has a small effect on efficiency compared with weight, tire pressure, speed and assist level, so it is rarely the deciding factor. A larger wheel loses slightly less momentum to surface impacts, which helps on rough ground. In practice the battery decides it. The AMYET G60 on 20-inch wheels carries 960 watt-hours against the 26-inch EB26 at 720, so the smaller-wheeled bike has the greater range by a wide margin. Compare watt-hours before you compare wheels.
Often not without removing the front wheel, and sometimes not even then. A 26 by 4 inch fat bike is long and tall, and the frame is built around that clearance. A 20-inch fat bike with the front wheel out will go into many estate cars and some hatchbacks. If car transport is part of your plan, measure your boot before ordering and check that any rack you own is rated for e-bike weight and has trays wide enough for a 4-inch tire, since many are not.
Short wheelbase, large-volume tires, a hub motor filling the rear wheel, a wide saddle and a substantial battery in the downtube add up to proportions closer to a small motorcycle than a bicycle. Whether that matters is practical rather than aesthetic: it can change how drivers treat you, how path enforcement reads you, and where a workplace or campus lets you park. A 26-inch fat bike reads as a mountain bike with thick tires, which for shared-path riders is a real if unglamorous advantage.
Keep reading

Buying guide · August 21, 2026
The seven decisions that actually determine whether you will enjoy the bike, in the order worth making them.
Read more
Buying guide · August 21, 2026
Rated, peak, nominal and "3000W". What each number means, which one predicts how a bike climbs, and which is marketing.
Read more
Buying guide · August 21, 2026
Volts times amp-hours gives watt-hours, and watt-hours is the only battery number worth comparing across brands.
Read more