
Buying guide · August 21, 2026
How to choose an electric bike
The seven decisions that actually determine whether you will enjoy the bike, in the order worth making them.
Read moreCompare AMYET’s Most Popular E-Bikes
Buying guide
Manufacturers are not lying about 65 miles. They are describing conditions you will never ride in.
Published August 21, 2026 · 11 min read

The short version
Start with the part most buying advice gets wrong. A brand claiming 65 miles is usually not inventing the number. Somebody genuinely rode that far, or a model predicted it from a measured consumption rate. The problem is the conditions.
A maximum range figure is generated with almost every variable set to its most favourable position at once:
Every one of those is defensible on its own. Stacked together they describe a ride nobody takes. You are heavier than the test rider, or carrying a bag; your route has junctions and hills; it is windy, or cold, or you are in a hurry. Each departure costs a percentage, and the percentages compound.
"Up to 65 miles" is a legally careful phrase. It states a ceiling and promises nothing beneath it. A bike that manages 22 miles on your commute has not broken the claim, because 22 is up to 65.
This is not unique to e-bikes. Broadband speeds, car fuel economy and phone battery life are all quoted the same way, and buyers have learned to discount them. E-bikes are newer, the numbers are larger, and the gap between the ceiling and the median is wider, so the discount most people apply is not steep enough.
The useful mental correction is to stop reading a range claim as a prediction and start reading it as a boundary. It tells you what the bike cannot exceed. Everything about what it will actually do comes from the battery's watt-hour figure and your own riding, which is why our battery and range guide spends its time on watt-hours rather than on miles.
Range is the specification buyers filter on. A listing that says 35 miles loses a search-result comparison to one that says 65, even when the two bikes have identical packs and one brand simply tested harder. Until buyers reward honest numbers, the pressure runs towards best-case figures. The counterweight is publishing conditions, or a band, or a second figure — which some brands do.
A single figure hides the variance. A band admits it. When a brand publishes "30 to 65 miles" instead of "up to 65 miles", it is telling you the shape of the distribution as well as its ceiling, and that is considerably more useful.
Two of AMYET's three listings do this, which is worth crediting because most of the sub-$1,000 market does not.
That EB26 disclosure is the most useful sentence on any of their product pages. It tells you the throttle-only figure is half the headline, which is exactly the ratio the physics predicts, and it saves a buyer from assuming the 60-mile number applies to the way they intend to ride.
The S8 is the one that needs the most interpretation. AMYET claims 70 to 75 miles maximum. The pack is the largest of the three at 1200Wh, but the bike has two 1000W motors, and a maximum-range figure for a dual-motor bike is almost certainly generated with one motor doing the work at low assist. Run both motors on the loose, steep ground the S8 exists for and consumption rises steeply. Treat 75 as the ceiling under the gentlest possible conditions, and plan against something closer to half of it. Our EB26 vs S8 comparison sets the two claims side by side.
These are ranked by how much they typically cost a rider over a normal week, not by how dramatic they sound.
Notice that six of the eight are conditions rather than components. You cannot buy your way out of them, which is why buying more watt-hours than you think you need is the only real defence.
This takes about a minute and gives you a number you can plan a route around.
Multiply the battery voltage by the amp-hours. The three AMYET bikes work out at 48 × 20 = 960Wh for the G60, 48 × 15 = 720Wh for the EB26, and 48 × 25 = 1200Wh for the S8. If a listing only gives you volts and amp-hours, that multiplication is the whole job.
Be honest about how you ride rather than how you intend to ride. For a heavy fat-tire e-bike, roughly 15–20Wh per mile covers gentle pedal assist on flat ground; roughly 22–28Wh per mile covers ordinary mixed riding; roughly 35–45Wh per mile covers throttle use, hills, heavy loads, cold or high speed. Most people should use 25.
Watt-hours divided by watt-hours-per-mile gives a raw estimate. Take 20% off it and that is your planning range — the distance you would be comfortable committing to without a charger at the far end.
The reserve is not pessimism. A battery's last 20% is where voltage sag is worst, where cold bites hardest, and where a headwind on the way home turns an inconvenience into a two-hour push. It is also the part of the cycle that ages cells fastest. Leaving it unused costs you very little and buys you the difference between arriving and walking.
The display is the instrument you manage range with, and there is a large practical gap between the two common types.
A five-bar gauge divides the pack into five blocks of 20%. Each bar covers roughly eight miles on a 960Wh pack in mixed riding, and the bars do not empty evenly — voltage falls slowly through the middle of the discharge curve and then quickly at the end, so the last bar disappears far faster than the first. You get a warning at the point where it is already too late to change the plan.
A percentage readout, particularly alongside a live voltage figure, lets you do the arithmetic mid-ride. If you are 12 miles in and showing 60%, you have used 40% for 12 miles, so the full pack is worth about 30 miles today, in these conditions, with this rider on board. That is worth more than any manufacturer claim, because it is a measurement of your actual ride.
AMYET lists an LCD showing speed, battery, mileage and assist mode on the G60, and on the EB26 an LCD with five assist levels plus battery, trip and odometer readouts. What we cannot confirm from the listings is whether the battery indicator is a percentage or a bar gauge on any given unit. If this matters to you — and if you ride to the edge of your range, it should — ask before ordering. We flag exactly this kind of unpublished detail rather than guessing at it, as explained on our how we review page.
Note your odometer and your battery percentage at the same two points on a route you ride often. After a fortnight you will know your own watt-hours per mile better than any specification sheet, in summer and in winter, and every range decision after that is straightforward.
Everybody gets it wrong once. A cold morning, a detour, a headwind that was not in the forecast, and the display is showing 15% with nine miles to go. Assume nothing dramatic happens: the bike does not stop, it just becomes progressively less helpful.
A heavy fat-tire e-bike is genuinely hard work to pedal unassisted, which is the real argument for the 20% reserve. The gears mean the bike still functions with a flat pack — they do not make it pleasant.
If range anxiety is shaping your shortlist rather than your route, the fix is at purchase rather than on the road: buy the largest pack you can, and read the power side of the sheet with the same scepticism in our motor wattage guide.
Mostly because there is no mandated test standard and range is the specification buyers filter on. A brand quoting a realistic 35 miles loses a search comparison to one quoting 65, even when the two bikes carry identical batteries. So maximum-range figures are generated with every variable at its most favourable setting at once: lowest assist, a light rider, flat ground, no wind, mild weather, moderate speed and a new pack. The number is usually achievable in those conditions. It is simply not a description of your commute.
For ordinary riding on a heavy fat-tire e-bike, planning on roughly 40 to 60% of the headline figure is sensible. A rider of average weight using moderate assist on mixed terrain tends to land near the middle of that. Cold weather, throttle use, hills, headwinds, soft tires or a heavy load push you towards the lower end, and several of those together can take you below it. Rather than discounting the claim, it is more reliable to calculate from watt-hours, which is arithmetic rather than marketing.
Three steps. Multiply the battery voltage by the amp-hours to get watt-hours — 48V times 20Ah is 960Wh. Choose a consumption figure that matches how you ride: roughly 15 to 20 watt-hours per mile for gentle pedal assist, 22 to 28 for mixed riding, and 35 to 45 for throttle, hills, cold or heavy loads. Divide, then subtract 20% as reserve. On a 960Wh pack at 25Wh per mile that gives about 38 miles raw and roughly 31 as a planning figure.
Yes, and more than most riders expect. Aerodynamic drag rises with the square of speed, and the power needed to overcome it rises with the cube. Going from 18 MPH to 28 MPH is a 1.5 times increase in speed but well over three times the aerodynamic power demand. On an upright bike with a rider sitting in clean air and fat tires adding rolling resistance, this dominates consumption above roughly 20 MPH. Slowing down is the most effective mid-ride correction available.
Two separate effects stack. Lithium cells deliver less of their stored capacity when cold, commonly 20 to 30% less below about 40°F, because internal resistance rises. Then winter riding itself is more expensive: heavier clothing, headwinds, wet roads with higher rolling resistance and colder, denser air. The capacity loss is temporary and returns when the pack warms, but the miles are gone for that ride. Storing the battery indoors and fitting it just before setting off recovers a useful part of the difference.
It is the most reliable answer, but it is not free. More watt-hours mean more weight to carry, a higher purchase price and a costlier eventual replacement pack. The better framing is to size the battery to your longest regular ride plus a fifth, rather than to the longest ride you can imagine. Beyond that, habits matter as much as capacity: lower assist levels, correct tire pressure, less throttle and a steadier speed will each shift real range more than a modest upgrade in pack size.
Keep reading

Buying guide · August 21, 2026
The seven decisions that actually determine whether you will enjoy the bike, in the order worth making them.
Read more
Buying guide · August 21, 2026
Rated, peak, nominal and "3000W". What each number means, which one predicts how a bike climbs, and which is marketing.
Read more
Buying guide · August 21, 2026
Volts times amp-hours gives watt-hours, and watt-hours is the only battery number worth comparing across brands.
Read more